Skip to content
NewsPipe

Proceedings of the Supreme Court

A routine list of the Texas Supreme Court's rulings and case dispositions from its session the previous day, preserved here as a record of the court's docket.

NewsPipe summary

The Austin Weekly Statesman · December 24, 1896 · Page 6

1 min read

Proceedings of the supreme court yesterday: Reversed and Remanded — Daniels et al. vs. Mason, from Tarrant.

Certified Question Answered — Minter et al. vs. Burnet, Administrator, et al., from Wichita.

Dismissed — Texas and Pacific Railway Company vs. Staggs et al., from Tarrant; Eustis et al. vs. City of Henrietta, from Clay.

Cases Set for Submission — Cleveland & Co. vs. Carr et al., from Polk, for January 14, 1897.

Rehearing Refused — Thompson vs. Baker, land commissioner, original mandamus; Classen vs. Elmendorf et al., from Bexar; Houston, East and West Texas Railway Company vs. Keller, from Harris.

Was this worth reading?

This is how the site learns what to look for. Ratings move the weights behind the front page; notes go into the editorial brief that guides what gets pulled from the archives next.

Feedback on “Proceedings of the Supreme Court”

Elsewhere in the archive

Petty Thefts Reported

The Austin Weekly Statesman · December 24, 1896 · Austin, Texas

Two minor thefts reported to Austin's Central police station on the same evening — blankets and shoes taken from local stores — a tiny record of everyday small-town crime.

A DESERVING CASE

The Austin Weekly Statesman · December 24, 1896 · Austin, Texas

A brief charitable appeal on behalf of a struggling Austin family, the Matscheks, asking local aid societies for help.

Sheriff White's Christmas Present

The Austin Weekly Statesman · December 24, 1896 · Austin, Texas

A small human-interest note on a departing sheriff gifted a gold and silver pistol by courthouse officials before heading home to Tennessee for the holidays.

IT'S A SHAME

The Austin Weekly Statesman · December 24, 1896 · Austin, Texas

A wry newsroom anecdote about a subscriber who canceled his paper over a strangely petty complaint, offering a glimpse of 1890s newspaper office humor.